“…Last,
but not least, every child wants to know. There they are, those desires, ready
to act on occasion and our business is to make due use of this natural
provision for the work of education. We do make use of the desires, not wisely,
but too well. We run our schools upon emulation, the desire of every child to be
first; and not the ablest, but the most pushing, comes to the front. We quicken
emulation by the common desire to get and to have, that is, by the impulse of
avarice. So we offer prizes, exhibitions, scholarships, every incentive that
can be proposed. We cause him to work for our approbation, we play upon his
vanity, and the boy does more than he can. What is the harm, we say, when all
those springs of action are in the child already? The athlete is beginning to
discover that he suffers elsewhere from the undue development of any set of
muscles; and the boy whose ambition, or emulation, has been unduly stimulated
becomes a flaccid person. But there is a worse evil. We all want knowledge just
as much as we want bread. We know it is possible to cure the latter appetite by
giving more stimulating food; and the worst of using other spurs to learning is
that a natural love of knowledge which should carry us through eager
school-days, and give a spice of adventure to the duller days of mature life,
is effectually choked; and boys and girls ‘cram to pass but not to know; they
do pass but they don’t know.’ The divine curiosity which should have been an
equipment for life hardly survives early schooldays.”
Charlotte Mason was a teacher in England the early 1900s. Although she taught thousands
of children, in her later years she began teaching parents and caregivers on how
children learn and thrive best. She stressed the importance of giving children
exposure to a wide variety of ideas and experiences, and giving them the
freedom to interpret the information for themselves. She believed in
encouraging curiosity, and guiding self-motivated learning for the sake of
understanding, rather than force-feeding information that was disconnected from
the world the children lived in. She believed that all children had the
capacity to learn in this way- in a society where poor children learned a trade
rather than receiving a formal education- regardless of their social or
economic “advantage,” because all children are born with the capacity to
observe and create their own ideas accordingly.
To
varying degrees, homeschool families largely ascribe to this same philosophy in
the instruction of their children. While textbooks and worksheets are often
used, there is a more pronounced focus on real-world, experiential learning,
which is more engaging and increases retention; textbook concepts are often reinforced
through practical application, so there is a better understanding of their
relevance for real life. This may contribute to the results of a recent study
by the National Home Education Research Institute, which concluded, “The
home-educated typically score 15 to 30 percentile points above public-school
students on standardized academic achievement tests.” These percentages were even more
pronounced in minority students. In addition, “Research facts on homeschooling
show that the home-educated are doing well, typically above average, on
measures of social, emotional, and psychological development. Research measures
include peer interaction, self-concept, leadership skills, family cohesion,
participation in community service, and self-esteem.”
The
academic advantage of homeschooling extends beyond the elementary and secondary
education years. Alpha Omega Publications states, “’The high achievement level
of homeschoolers is readily recognized by recruiters from some of the best
colleges in the nation,” said Dr. Susan Berry, who researches and writes about
educational topics like the fast growing rate of homeschooling. “Schools such
as Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard, Stanford, and Duke
University all actively recruit homeschoolers.’”
“Educational
consultant and former homeschool mom Dori Staehle recruited both homeschool and
public school students in her job as a college admissions counselor. Staehle
said that schools have caught on to the fact that homeschoolers represent a
desirable pool of talent, often possessing impressive reading lists, letters of
recommendation, AP credits, and experience in volunteering and the arts.”
Business
Insider states, “…the term "homeschooling" is actually kind of a
misnomer: Learning at home is only part of the equation. It's really about
involving the surrounding community in raising the kids — that's when education
starts to excel. Away from the standardized tests and rigid schedules in public
education, kids can let their creative sides flourish, learn about the world
they live in, and, when it's time, earn acceptance into the best colleges in the
world.”
While
homeschooled students thrive academically, in the early years and through
college, public school students tend to struggle. “According to research…just
under 40 percent of students score at college and career ready levels on NAEP. "College
and career ready" means these scores strongly predict that students will
be able to succeed doing college-level academics, or with on-the-job training
in a position requiring only a high school diploma.” This contrast is shocking, especially
when one considers that taxpayers pay an average of $13,000 per year, per
public school student.
It
is daunting to undertake a task as monumental as homeschooling, and to know
that your children rely on you to prepare them for the “real world” later. However,
there is a lot of evidence to support the positive outcome for students taught
at home, regardless of the education level of their parents. Homeschool parents are able to give
their children unparalleled attention and a much more personalized education
experience than even the best overworked teacher. Children learn the most
through experiences, and experiences are much easier to have with the
flexibility of a homeschool environment.
No comments:
Post a Comment